← Back to all cases · Learning and reproduction
English · 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español · Français · Deutsch · Português (Brasil) · Русский · العربية · हिन्दी
- Author / attribution: sickpyramid
- Source review date: 2026-10-19
- Review status: Sources reviewed; author tests not independently rerun.
- Target: Two pairs of open-source JavaScript libraries: ms + pretty-bytes, and dequal + klona
How can two projects become behavior specifications and then a new combined tool?
REA 6.4.0 JavaScript static analysis reads the two inputs. README files and tests help produce behavior specifications; the model separately proposes combinations, writes acceptance contracts and new code, then runs the author’s tests and similarity scans.
The author publishes ratewise (transfer rate and ETA) and objdelta (structural diff/patch), reports and Evidence. Reported contract results are 18/18 and 17/17, plus 7/7 and 6/6 tests for the new tools. Both examples count as one project case.
Only two public JavaScript examples were reviewed; the project is v0.1 alpha. The same workflow produces specifications and implementations. The author’s clean-room label is not an independent legal conclusion. Similarity scans and passing tests do not establish general originality or complete equivalence. This catalog did not rerun them.
Connect analysis to implementation through behavior specifications, mapping tests to either input behavior or the new combination.
Excerpt formatting is simplified. Read the original source for full context.
Every donor goes through REA's static JavaScript analysis
Independent editorial summary. Credit belongs to the original authors. Target software, installers and complete decompiler output are not redistributed here.