Skip to content

site: move to 1.3.0 and resync the compose copy from upstream - #91

Open
yusuf-gundogdu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
surum/libredb-studio-1.3.0
Open

yusuf-gundogdu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
surum/libredb-studio-1.3.0

Conversation

@yusuf-gundogdu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The version line goes to 1.3.0.

While checking that, the compose page turned out to be serving an older upstream than the tag claimed. Three things on it were wrong:

  • LLM_MODEL_EFFORT was missing from the copied file, so the variable table on /docker-compose omitted a variable the image reads.
  • The node version read 26.10.0. The Dockerfile at 1.3.0 builds the runner FROM node:26.13.0-trixie-slim, and the correction's reason still cited 0.18.3.
  • upstreamCompose.sha256 was the hash of the stale copy with its corrections reverted, not of upstream, so the gate was comparing the file with itself and could not catch the drift.

The copy is rebuilt from upstream 1.3.0 with the same six comment corrections, moved to their new line numbers (the MCP comment block grew by two lines, so 129 became 132), and sha256 is now upstream's own hash.

Checked locally with bun 1.4.2: typecheck 0 errors, format clean, lint unchanged, build complete, 233 tests pass.

The version line goes to 1.3.0. The compose page's copy of
docker-compose.example.yml was taken from an older upstream than the tag
claimed, so three things on the page were wrong:

- LLM_MODEL_EFFORT was missing, so the variable table omitted a variable
  the image reads.
- The node version read 26.10.0; the Dockerfile at 1.3.0 builds the
  runner FROM node:26.13.0-trixie-slim, and the correction's reason still
  cited 0.18.3.
- upstreamCompose.sha256 was the hash of the stale copy restored, not of
  upstream, so the gate compared the file with itself.

The copy is rebuilt from upstream 1.3.0 with the same six comment
corrections, moved to their new line numbers, and sha256 is now upstream's
own hash.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant